MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temsirolimus combined with etoposide and cyclophosphamide for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Therapeutic advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium (TACL 2014-001) trial.

2020· article· en· W3028973751 on OpenAlexaff
Susan R. Rheingold, Lewis B. Silverman, James A. Whitlock, Richard Sposto, Eric S. Schafer, Kirk R. Schultz, Raymond J. Hutchinson, Paul S. Gaynon, Caroline M. Bateman, Todd M. Cooper, Theodore W. Laetsch, Maria Luisa Sulis, Alan S. Wayne, Sarah K. Tasian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenBC Children's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTemsirolimusEtoposideGastroenterologyMucositisFebrile neutropeniaLeukopeniaNeutropeniaToxicityChemotherapyPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10512 Background: PI3K/mTOR signaling, a critical pathway in cell proliferation, metabolism, and apoptosis, is often dysregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A phase 1 trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus combined with etoposide and cyclophosphamide was performed in children with relapsed/refractory (r/r) ALL. Methods: Temsirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 with cyclophosphamide 440 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV daily days 1-5. The starting dose level (DL) of temsirolimus was 7.5 mg/m2 (DL1) with escalation to 10 mg/m2 (DL2), 15 mg/m2 (DL3), and 25 mg/m2 (DL4). MRD was performed centrally. PI3K pathway inhibition was measured by phosphoflow cytometry (PFC) analysis of peripheral blood (PB) from treated patients (pts). Results: Sixteen heavily pretreated r/r ALL pts ages 2-19 years with marrow blasts > 25% were enrolled; 15 were evaluable [10 B-ALL/5 T-ALL]. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade (Gr) 4 pleural and pericardial effusions with pneumonitis/lung infection leading to Gr 5 cardiorespiratory arrest occurred in a pt treated at DL3. No further DLTs were seen in the DL3 expansion and DL4 cohorts. Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurring in ≥ 3 pts included febrile neutropenia, elevated ALT, hypokalemia, mucositis, and tumor lysis syndrome and were independent of dose. Of 15 evaluable pts, 4 (27%; 2 B-ALL/2 T-ALL) had a complete response (CR) after cycle 1, comprised of 1 pt at each DL. Three had MRD < 0.01%. Three pts (20%; 2 B-ALL/1 T-ALL) had partial response (PR). Overall response rate (CR+PR = ORR) was 47%. Pharmacodynamic PFC studies compared phosphoprotein levels pre (day 0) and post treatment (days 3-5) in 9 consenting pts with available PB. All tested pts showed basal activation of PI3K pathway signaling. Dose-dependent inhibition of mTOR targets phosphorylated (p) S6 and/or p4EBP1 was observed in 9/9 and 6/9 pts, respectively, following temsirolimus and chemotherapy treatment. Various patterns of compensatory upregulation of pPI3K, pmTOR, pAkt, and/or pERK was observed. Conclusions: Temsirolimus at 25 mg/m2 combined with salvage etoposide and cyclophosphamide has an acceptable safety profile in high-risk pediatric patients with r/r ALL. Responses were observed at all DLs. mTOR target inhibition was achieved and appeared to correlate with dose level. Future testing of other PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy may be warranted with a goal of further increasing response in r/r ALL. Clinical trial information: NCT01614197.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207