MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029020027 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.1127

1133 The Recovery of Sleep Oscillations in Acute to Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury

2020· article· en· W3029020027 on OpenAlexaffabout
Erlan Sanchez, Catherine Duclos, Solenne Van der Maren, Héjar El-Khatib, Caroline Arbour, Andrée‐Ann Baril, Hélène Blais, Julie Carrier, Nadia Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanMcGill UniversityCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysomnographyTraumatic brain injuryMedicineNon-rapid eye movement sleepAnesthesiaSleep (system call)Sleep spindleAnalysis of varianceSlow-wave sleepCardiologyInternal medicineElectroencephalographyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Slow waves and spindles are essential oscillations occurring during NREM sleep that may be disrupted by moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated these oscillations in the acute and chronic trauma stage. Methods Four groups were tested with whole-night polysomnography: hospitalized patients with acute TBI (n=10, 29.7±13.8y) or severe orthopedic injuries (n=15, 39.9±17.1y), chronic TBI including 9 returning from the acute TBI group (n=43, 31.9±13.5y), and healthy controls (n=36, 30.5±12.7y). Characteristics for slow waves (density, amplitude, slope, frequency, duration) and spindles (density, amplitude, frequency, duration) were quantified over N2 and N3 sleep for the first three sleep cycles, and groups were compared using one-way ANOVAs. Results One-way ANOVAs showed group effects only for slow wave density (F=4.11 to 6.04, p=0.009 to 0.0008)) and spindle density (F=3.3 to 8.8, p=0.02 to 0.00003). These effects were present for the 2nd and 3rd sleep cycles, but not the 1st. More specifically, slow wave density in acute TBI was higher than in controls, and returned to normal levels in the chronic stage. Conversely, spindle density in acute TBI was lower than in controls and returned to normal levels in the chronic stage. No group difference was observed for the orthopedic group. Conclusion Our results suggest that immediately after a severely disruptive event such as a TBI, the brain needs additional deeper sleep to recover, resulting in more slow waves but also in less spindles. These changes are only present in the 2nd and 3rd sleep cycles, reflecting an absence of the expected dissipation of slow waves, which may suggest increased homeostatic sleep pressure due to the brain injury. Limits to interpretation include the hospital environment and medication, but the absence of changes in the orthopedic group under similar conditions emphasizes the effect of the brain injury itself. Support Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and Fonds de Recherche Québec-Santé (FRQS)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207