MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High-risk primary disease and medical factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in neonates: A Meta-analysis

2015· article· en· W3029035548 on OpenAlex
Zheng Xiao, Cheng-Qiong Wang, Bangjiang Huang, Yalin Chu, Shiyun Hu, Long-Min Qiu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJournal of practical nursing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioVentilator-associated pneumoniaRespiratory distressPneumoniaInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To provide the evidences for the management strategies of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in neonates, we systematically reviewed all related studies and analyzed the high-risk primary disease and medical factors of VAP in neonates. Methods We retrieved all related studies in CNKI, Wan-fang, VIP, CBM, Pubmed and Embase and evaluated their quality by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and analyzed all data by qualitative and Meta-analysis. Results There were 12 case-control studies with higher methodological quality and involving 1 994 neonates and with 708 VAP patients. Six studies involving 872 neonates were in-cluded, the odds ratio of respiratory distress syndrome(OR=2.81) and malnutrition(OR=5.18) had significant differences between VAP and non-VAP group. Seven studies involving 1 110 neonates were included and the odds ratio of patients with corticosteroids (OR=3.12), central inhibitors (OR=2.31), antacids (OR=4.35) and Gamma globulin with large doses (OR=2.35) had significant differences between VAP group and non VAP. Four studies involving 554 neonates were included and the odds ratio of patients with closed chest drainage (OR=1.81)and umbilical vein catheterization (OR=9.19) had significant differences between VAP group and non VAP. Six studies involving 1 139 neonates were included and the odds ratio of patients with parenteral nutrition (OR=1.82)and blood transfusions (OR=2.49) had significant differences between VAP group and non VAP. Conclusions Our study confirms that the respiratory distress syndrome and malnutrition corticosteroids, central inhibitors, antacids, Gamma globulin with large doses, closed chest drainage, umbilical vein catheteriza-tion, parenteral nutrition and blood transfusions are important risk and early-warning factors. Key words: Neonates; Ventilator-associated pneumonia; Primary disease; Medical factors; Meta-analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it