Relationship research between mild cognitive impairment and quality of life in hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relationship between mild cognitive impairment and quality of life in hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy. Methods One hundred and twenty-five hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy were selected in Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology from December 2014 to December 2016, and were divided into two groups according to mild cognitive impairment, including 73 patients without mild cognitive impairment as control group, and 52 patients with mild cognitive impairment as observation group.Patients received Montreal cognitive assessment scale and kidney disease quality of life scale.Patients received clinical index detection. Results Montreal cognitive assessment scale(visual space and execution(3.0±0.7) points, naming(2.4±0.3) points, attention(4.3±0.7) points, language(2.1±0.4) points, abstraction(1.1±0.2) points, delayed recall(1.6±0.3) points, orientation(5.4±0.5) points) score, kidney disease quality of life scale(physical(70.3±3.5) points, physical constraints due to work and life(14.6±2.8) points, pain(56.4±7.1) points, general health(36.2±3.4) points, emotional status(51.3±2.6) points, social function(52.7±3.4) points, mental status(43.2±3.6) points, emotional constraints due to work and life(41.3±2.8) points, symptoms(73.6±2.1) points, work status(20.3±1.6) points, cognitive function(72.7±1.8) points, nephropathy effect(49.1±3.2) points, sexual function(53.2±4.0) points, burden of nephropathy(21.3±2.6) points, sleep quality(70.1±1.5) points, social quality(43.3±1.9) points, social support(71.2±2.3) points) score in observation group were lower than control group((4.4±0.8) points, (3.0±0.0) points, (5.4±0.5) points, (2.7±0.3) points, (1.8±0.4) points, (3.4±0.6) points, (6.0±0.0) points), ((78.6±4.1) points, (25.7±3.6) points, (69.8±4.2) points, (41.0±2.7) points, (58.5±3.0) points, (61.2±3.8) points, (53.4±2.8) points, (46.5±2.4) points, (82.9±3.2) points, (24.2±2.7) points, (81.6±2.3) points, (65.3±4.0) points, (62.8±3.9) points, (35.7±2.8) points, (79.3±2.0) points, (59.7±2.4) points, (82.4±2.6) points)(t=7.667, 5.502, 5.558, 5.857, 9.364, 14.250, 4.112, 4.038, 10.603, 5.321, 4.326, 4.403, 4.613, 5.361, 4.262, 4.315, 4.923, 4.224, 6.265, 4.804, 6.712, 4.316, 6.787, 4.573, all P<0.05). Conclusion Hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy has mild cognitive impairment, while quality of life is low. Key words: Diabetic nephropathy; Hemodialysis; Mild cognitive impairment; Life quality
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".