MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Relationship research between mild cognitive impairment and quality of life in hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy

2017· article· en· W3029135093 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shulan Cai, Xiuhong Han, Jianjun Liu, Xiuling Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo zonghe linchuang · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentQuality of life (healthcare)Diabetic nephropathyCognitionMedicineHemodialysisKidney diseasePhysical therapyInternal medicinePsychiatryCognitive impairmentKidneyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the relationship between mild cognitive impairment and quality of life in hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy. Methods One hundred and twenty-five hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy were selected in Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology from December 2014 to December 2016, and were divided into two groups according to mild cognitive impairment, including 73 patients without mild cognitive impairment as control group, and 52 patients with mild cognitive impairment as observation group.Patients received Montreal cognitive assessment scale and kidney disease quality of life scale.Patients received clinical index detection. Results Montreal cognitive assessment scale(visual space and execution(3.0±0.7) points, naming(2.4±0.3) points, attention(4.3±0.7) points, language(2.1±0.4) points, abstraction(1.1±0.2) points, delayed recall(1.6±0.3) points, orientation(5.4±0.5) points) score, kidney disease quality of life scale(physical(70.3±3.5) points, physical constraints due to work and life(14.6±2.8) points, pain(56.4±7.1) points, general health(36.2±3.4) points, emotional status(51.3±2.6) points, social function(52.7±3.4) points, mental status(43.2±3.6) points, emotional constraints due to work and life(41.3±2.8) points, symptoms(73.6±2.1) points, work status(20.3±1.6) points, cognitive function(72.7±1.8) points, nephropathy effect(49.1±3.2) points, sexual function(53.2±4.0) points, burden of nephropathy(21.3±2.6) points, sleep quality(70.1±1.5) points, social quality(43.3±1.9) points, social support(71.2±2.3) points) score in observation group were lower than control group((4.4±0.8) points, (3.0±0.0) points, (5.4±0.5) points, (2.7±0.3) points, (1.8±0.4) points, (3.4±0.6) points, (6.0±0.0) points), ((78.6±4.1) points, (25.7±3.6) points, (69.8±4.2) points, (41.0±2.7) points, (58.5±3.0) points, (61.2±3.8) points, (53.4±2.8) points, (46.5±2.4) points, (82.9±3.2) points, (24.2±2.7) points, (81.6±2.3) points, (65.3±4.0) points, (62.8±3.9) points, (35.7±2.8) points, (79.3±2.0) points, (59.7±2.4) points, (82.4±2.6) points)(t=7.667, 5.502, 5.558, 5.857, 9.364, 14.250, 4.112, 4.038, 10.603, 5.321, 4.326, 4.403, 4.613, 5.361, 4.262, 4.315, 4.923, 4.224, 6.265, 4.804, 6.712, 4.316, 6.787, 4.573, all P<0.05). Conclusion Hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy has mild cognitive impairment, while quality of life is low. Key words: Diabetic nephropathy; Hemodialysis; Mild cognitive impairment; Life quality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo zonghe linchuangSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207