MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correlation of empathy with cognitive function in patients with cerebral small vessel disease

2020· article· en· W3029141938 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Chen, Xiao‐Jing Wang, Shanshan Cao, Jun Zhang, Qiang Wei, Lei Zhang, Kai Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua xingwei yixue yu naokexue zazhi · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamdInterpersonal Reactivity IndexEmpathyCorrelationPsychologyInternal medicinePerspective-takingCognitionClinical psychologyAnxietyMedicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the empathy of patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and its relationship with cognitive functions. Methods A total of 35 patients with CSVD and 26 normal controls with matching gender, age and education were enrolled.The Chinese version of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI-C) and the multifaceted empathy test(MET) were used to assess the empathy of the participants.The montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), the Hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA), and the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) were applied to assess participants' overall cognitive function and emotional state.SPSS 19.0 software was used to analyze the differences between the CSVD group and the control group, while the influencing factors of empathy were studied by Pearson correlation analysis. Results The total scores of IRI, perspective taking(PT), fantasy(FS) and empathy concern(EC) of CSVD patients ((37.25±11.71), (6.94±4.35), (9.45±4.68) and (16.40±4.34)) were lower than those of the control group ((50.61±11.07), (11.84±3.90), (13.23±5.01), (19.69±3.03)), and the differences were statistically significant (IRI score: t=4.506, P 0.05). The MET-C results showed that there was a difference in the correct number of empathic emotion recognition between the two groups(CVSD group: (25.08±6.77), control group: (32.30±3.42), t=4.978, P 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the total score of IRI and PT in the CSVD group were positively correlated with education level (r=0.374, 0.471, both P<0.05). PT was positively correlated with MoCA score (r=0.458, P=0.006). PD was positively correlated with HAMA score and HAMD score (r=0.521, 0.541, both P<0.05). The correct number of emotion recognition was positively correlated with education level (r=0.600, P<0.001) and MoCA score (r=0.665, P<0.001), and negatively correlated with HAMA score(r=-0.445, P<0.05) and HAMD score (r=-0.421, P<0.05). Conclusion The empathy of patients with CSVD is lower than that of the normal group, and it is manifested as a decline in cognitive empathy, which is positively related to the overall cognitive function. Key words: Cerebral small vessel disease; Empathy; Cognitive function

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua xingwei yixue yu naokexue zazhiSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207