MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029167449 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzaa045_056

Standardized High Versus Low Dose Cranberry Proanthocyanidin Extracts for Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection Confirmed by Pyuria in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2020· article· en· W3029167449 on OpenAlexaff
Vicky Leblanc, Asma Babar, Lyne Moore, Stéphanie Dudonné, Yves Desjardins, Simone Lemieux, Valérie Bochard, Denis Guyonnet, Amy B. Howell, Sylvie Dodin

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyuriaMedicineUrineUrinary systemRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineClinical trialUrinalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cranberry products are often used by women to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) but literature regarding their efficacy remains discordant. The clinical efficacy of cranberry products for prevention of UTIs in healthy women could be increased by 1) using an optimal dose of cranberry extract standardized in proanthocyanidins (PACs); 2) adequate measure of compliance. The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of an optimal dose of cranberry extract standardized in PACs for the prevention of recurrent UTI confirmed by pyuria during a 24-week intervention period. One hundred and forty-five women with a history of recurrent UTI in the past 12 months were randomized to receive a dose of cranberry extract Urophenol™, standardized in PACs (2 × 18.5 mg PACs daily, n = 72) or a control dose (2 × 1 mg PACs daily, n = 73) for a 24-week period. Women were asked to contact the study coordinator if they presented symptoms of UTI and to provide a urine sample to evaluate the diagnosis by confirmation of pyuria. Since some women were unable to provide a urine sample in the presence of UTI symptoms, regression analyses were performed with two different approaches, 1) symptomatic UTI episodes without a urine sample were considered as no symptomatic UTIs with pyuria; 2) symptomatic UTI episodes without a urine sample were considered as symptomatic UTIs with pyuria. Analyses were adjusted for age. No significant differences in the number of symptomatic UTI with pyuria were found between groups during the 24-week intervention period in intention to treat analyses using either approach (approach 1: incidence rate ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.57–1.68; approach 2: 0.86, 95% CI 0.56–1.32). Among women who experienced less than 5 UTIs in the year preceding enrolment, daily consumption of 2 × 18.5 mg PACs was associated with a decrease in the number of symptomatic UTIs compared to the control dose (approach 1: incidence rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.31–1.37; approach 2: 0.54, 95% CI 0.30–0.99). Compliance to capsule intake was higher than 90% in both groups. In women who experience less than 5 UTIs in the last year, daily consumption of a standardized dose of 2 × 18.5 mg PACs could have a preventative impact on the incidence of symptomatic UTIs confirmed by pyuria. Supported by Diana Foods and MAPAQ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207