MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantification of immune cell-mediated destruction of tumor cells <i>in vitro</i> using the RNA disruption assay.

2020· article· en· W3029199196 on OpenAlexaff
Isabella Pascheto, Laura B. Pritzker, Aseem Kumar, Amadeo M. Parissenti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsK562 cellsImmune systemCancer researchMedicineRNACellPeripheral blood mononuclear cellCytotoxic T cellPopulationLeukemiaCancer cellCancerImmunologyBiologyIn vitroInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15017 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used in the treatment of human cancers, often in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs. However, current ICIs are costly and are only effective against a fraction of patient tumours. Thus, a tool that could reliably quantify tumour response to ICIs and predict outcome post-treatment would be highly valuable. Patients with non-responding tumours could be spared the costs and toxic side-effects of the ineffective drugs and moved promptly to alternate treatments. We have observed that a variety of structurally and mechanistically distinct chemotherapy agents induce the degradation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) into a large number of high molecular weight fragments (between the 28S and 18S rRNAs)---a phenomenon we have termed “RNA disruption”. High tumour RNA disruption during treatment, as quantified using the RNA disruption assay (RDA), has been shown to predict pathologic complete response and improved disease-free survival in breast cancer patients. Methods: To assess whether RDA could be used to monitor immune cell killing of tumour cells, we collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from consenting healthy human donors and enriched the cell population for natural killer (NK) cells to 90% using a negative selection approach. The cells, with or without IL-2 pre-treatment, were incubated with K562 cells, after which K562 cell killing was quantified over time using a standard immunocytotoxicity assay and K562 cell RNA disruption was measured using RDA. Results: Freshly isolated human NK cells when incubated with K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells induced cell destruction and RNA disruption in K562 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Pre-incubation with IL-2 augmented both NK cell-mediated RNA disruption and NK-mediated cytotoxicity in K562 cells. Interestingly, the pattern of K562 RNA disruption fragments generated by NK cells was similar to that generated by chemotherapy drugs. Conclusions: RDA was successfully used to quantify immune cell-mediated destruction of tumour cells, raising the prospect of its possible use to monitor tumour destruction by immune cells in vivo and to predict response to ICIs (alone or in concert with cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207