INDUCE-3: A randomized, double-blind study of GSK3359609 (GSK609), an inducible T-cell co-stimulatory (ICOS) agonist antibody, plus pembrolizumab (PE) versus placebo (PL) plus PE for first-line treatment of PD-L1-positive recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS6591 Background: Pembrolizumab as part of first-line treatment for patients (pts) with R/M HNSCC has improved survival. However, in order to further improve outcomes in this population investigation of rational combinations targeting different mechanisms that cancers exploit to evade the immune system is required. ICOS, a member of the CD28/B7 immunoglobulin receptor superfamily, provides a co-stimulatory signal augmenting T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, cytotoxic function and survival. GSK609 is a humanized IgG4 antibody selected for its potent agonist activity and non-depleting properties. The rationale for targeting ICOS with GSK609 plus PD-1 blockade with PE is supported by preclinical and clinical evidence (Rischin, et al. Annals of Oncol 2019;30[Supplement_5]:v454–5). INDUCE-3 trial (NCT04128696) will explore if the addition of GSK609 to PE improves outcomes of pts with R/M HNSCC. Methods: INDUCE-3 uses a 2-in-1 adaptive design that has the option to seamlessly expand from an initial Phase 2 to a Phase 3 study. Pts (n = 600) will be stratified by PD-L1 status and HPV status (oropharynx only) then randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive GSK609 plus PE or PL plus PE, every 3 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 35 cycles. GSK609 plus PE will be assessed for superiority versus PL plus PE in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECISTv1.1 as dual primary endpoints; secondary endpoints include PFS per immune-based RECIST; milestone OS; safety and tolerability; time to deterioration in patient-reported physical function and pain. Efficacy and patient-reported outcome endpoints will be assessed in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 and ≥20 populations. Key eligibility criteria are aged ≥18 years; locally incurable R/M HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx; no prior systemic therapy in the R/M setting; PD-L1 CPS ≥1 by central testing; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 and ECOG PS 0/1. Recruitment is ongoing in countries across the globe. Funding: Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline and in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Clinical trial information: NCT04128696 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".