Effects of auditory training on cognitive function in patients with stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of TOMATIS audio training on the rehabilitation of patients with cognitive impairment after stroke. Methods A total of 80 patients with cognitive impairment after stroke were randomly divided into experimental group (40 cases) and control group (40 cases). The two groups received conventional rehabilitative nursing. The control group was given TOMATIS conventional music training (conventional frequency music without audio processing), while the experimental group was given the TOMATIS audio training ( music with audio processing). The patients were evaluated with Montreal cognitive assessment scale(MoCA) before and after intervention. Results After two-cycle TOMATIS audio training, the total score of MoCA(17.43±4.11) in experimental group were higher than that before intervention(13.48±3.28), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.01), while the memory, executive function, visual skills, abstract thinking and total standard score significantly increased in control group(P<0.05). Scores of each item and total standard score of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group after the intervention(P<0.05). Conclusion TOMATIS audio training can improve cognitive function of patients with stroke. Key words: Stroke; Cognitive impairment; TOMATIS audio training
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".