Phase II basket trial of olaparib and durvalumab in patients (pts) with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutated solid tumors.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS3167 Background: Somatic IDH mutations are common in low grade gliomas, and rare in other solid tumors with the exception of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICA) and certain subtypes of chondrosarcoma. IDH mutations confer a gain-of-function neomorphic activity, such that mutant IDH enzymes preferentially convert αKG to 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG), resulting in abnormal accumulation of 2HG. 2HG competitively inhibits αKG-dependent dioxygenases, many of which are involved in DNA repair. Preclinical studies show that IDH mutated cancer cells have defective homologous recombination repair and are exquisitely sensitive to poly (adenosine 5’-diphophate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. Methods: This is a single arm phase II basket study (NCT03991832). Pts with IDH mutated solid tumors are divided into three cohorts; A: low-grade glioma; B: cholangiocarinoma; C: all other solid tumors. Pts are treated with olaparib 300 mg twice daily continuously and durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks until progression, intolerable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Radiological assessment is performed after every 2 cycles of study treatments. Major eligibility criteria include IDH mutation by immunohistochemistry or sequencing, up to 2 lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease, performance status 0 – 2 and adequate organ function. Pts are excluded if they received prior PARP inhibitors and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody. The Simon’s optimal 2-stage design is applied for Cohorts A and B. 10 pts will be enrolled in each of Cohort A and B initially. If 2 or more partial responses (PR) are seen in these 10 pts, additional 19 pts will be enrolled for a total of 29 pts in that cohort. The combination is considered to be of clinical interest for further development if ≥ 6 PRs are seen in each cohort. Cohort C will enroll 20 pts. Archival tumor tissues and serial blood samples will be collected on study. 2HG levels will be measured and correlated with responses. The study was activated in December 2019. 3 pts have been enrolled into Cohort B. Clinical trial information: NCT03991832 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".