CCL5 persists in RSV stocks following sucrose-gradient purification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is associated with bronchiolitis in infancy and the later development of asthma. Research on RSV in vitro requires preparation of a purified RSV stock. The objective for this work was to develop best methods for RSV purification, while monitoring the samples for potential contaminating proinflammatory mediators. Using polyethylene glycol concentration, and sucrose-gradient ultracentrifugation, we collected samples at each step of purification and measured the values of RSV titer, total protein (µg/mL), and proinflammatory cytokines (ELISA). We analyzed the efficacy of each step in the purification procedure. In so doing, we also determined that despite optimal purification methods, a well-known chemokine in the field of allergic disease, CCL5 (RANTES), persisted within the virus preparations, whereas other cytokines did not. We suggest that researchers should be aware that CCL5 appears to co-purify with RSV. Despite reasonable purification methods, a significant level of CCL5 (RANTES) persists in the virus preparation. This is relevant to the study of RSV-induced allergic disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".