MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029470381 · doi:10.4095/321080

Three-dimensional geological modelling of the Paleozoic bedrock of southern Ontario: status update

2020· report· en· W3029470381 on OpenAlexaffabout
T R Carter, F R Brunton, J K Clark, L Fortner, C Logan, H A J Russell, M.L. Somers, L Sutherland, K Yeung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleozoicBedrockGeologyPaleontologyGeochemistryEarth science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A regional 3-D lithostratigraphic model of the Paleozoic bedrock of southern Ontario was completed in 2019. The model encompasses the entire Phanerozoic succession of southern Ontario (110,000 km2), comprised of over 1,400 m of sedimentary strata straddling regional arches/forebulge zones separating the Appalachian Foreland Basin from the Michigan Structural Basin. This ambitious initiative provides an unprecedented regional 3-D perspective and digital framework and is amenable to numeric modelling of groundwater flow. Conversion to a 3-D hydrostratigraphic model is a future initiative. Model construction is guided by an updated regional lithostratigraphic chart, and utilizes Leapfrog Works - an implicit modelling application. There are 54 modelled Paleozoic bedrock layers representing 70 formations, plus the Precambrian basement, plus overlying unconsolidated sediments. Borehole records in Ontario's public petroleum well database (www.ogsrlibrary.com) are the principal data source, supplemented by Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) deep boreholes. A newly revised digital bedrock topography surface combined with revised subcrop geology and digitized 3-D surface polyline and point constraints are used to better align the modelled layers and their extrapolation to the subcrop surface. The modern topographic surface is integrated using Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) DEM data, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) lake bathymetry and Canadian Hydrographic data for smaller lakes. Model development is an iterative cycle of interim modelling, expert geological appraisal, and QA/QC editing of geological data using geophysical logs, drill cuttings, and core, supplemented by manual editing of model layers. From 2015 to 2018, project geologists and geological contract staff of the Oil, Gas and Salt Resources Library completed edits to 30,320 formation tops in a total of 7,490 wells, resulting in a revised dataset and improvements to the petroleum well database. The current and final model (iteration 7) provides a geologically robust representation of regional bedrock geology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207