MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physiologic colonic uptake of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG on PET/CT predicts immunotherapy response and gut microbiome diversity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020· article· en· W3029487762 on OpenAlexaff
Lena Cvetkovic, Claudine Régis, Valerio Iebba, Lisa Derosa, Antoine Leblond, Julie Malo, Meriem Messaoudene, Wiam Belkaïd, Arielle Elkrief, Bertrand Routy, Daniel Juneau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-QuébecCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColorectal cancerInternal medicineLung cancerGastroenterologyOncologyMicrobiomeImmune systemCancerDysbiosisImmunologyBioinformaticsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9600 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent the backbone treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. Emerging evidence suggests increased gut microbiome (GM) diversity is associated with favorable response. Conversely, antibiotic-induced dysbiosis may be associated with deleterious outcomes in patients receiving ICI in multiple retrospective studies and one prospective study. 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake on PET/CT increases following treatment with antibiotics and could be a surrogate marker for GM diversity and therefore clinical response. The aim of this study was to determine if 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake prior to ICI initiation correlates with outcomes and GM metagenomics in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: 71 patients with aNSCLC who underwent PET/CT prior to ICI were identified. For each patient, the colon was manually contoured, SUVmax was measured in each segment of the colon by a nuclear medicine specialist and average SUVmax was calculated for the whole colon. Patients were stratified in two groups according to median colon SUVmax (low vs high uptake). 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake was then compared to overall survival (OS), objective response (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS). For patients with available stool samples (n = 10), GM composition was defined using metagenomics sequencing. Results: 71 patients (54% men, median age: 68 years) with aNSCLC were included in the study and ICI was the first line of therapy in 38% of those patients. The mean colon SUV for the low and high uptake groups were 1.41 (CI 95% 1.35-1.47) and 2.18 (CI 95% 1.90-2.46) respectively. The high uptake group had a higher proportion of non-responders (p = 0.033) and significant shorter PFS (4.1 months vs 11.3 months, p = 0.005). In the caecum, high uptake also correlated with numerically shorter OS (10.82 vs 27.56 months, p = 0.058) compared to low uptake group. Despite the low number of samples, metagenomics sequencing revealed that PLS-DA (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis) for diversity was lower in the high SUV group (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Higher colon SUVmax on pre-ICI FDG PET/CT is associated with worse clinical outcomes and lower baseline GM diversity in patients with advanced NSCLC. Here, we propose that 18F-FDG physiologic colonic uptake on PET/CT could serve as a surrogate marker of GM diversity and predicts clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207