Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): B2001X study focusing on prior exposure to blinatumomab (BLINA) and inotuzumab (INO).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10518 Background: B2001X (NCT03123939) is a multicenter global study of tisa to provide access to patients (pts) with r/r ALL including prior anti-CD19 therapy after enrollment ended in the pivotal ELIANA (NCT02435849) study. We report clinical outcomes and cellular kinetics in B2001X including pts with prior BLINA exposure or INO as bridging therapy (BT). Methods: Eligible pts ≤21 y at diagnosis with ≥2 relapse, refractory or post allogeneic transplant (alloSCT) relapse were enrolled globally. Results: As of Nov 4, 2019, 73 pts were enrolled; 67 received tisa. 91% received lymphodepletion. Among 65 pts ≥3 mo follow up (FU) or discontinued earlier (efficacy analysis set [EAS]) median FU was 9.6 mo (range [R] 0.2-16.5). Median age 10 y (R 2-33); prior alloSCT 61%; 15 pts had prior BLINA and 9 pts had INO as BT. Efficacy is summarized in Table. 13/14 relapsed pts were medullary (isolated or combined with extramedullary [EM]) and 1 EM; 9 within 6 mo including 4/5 who were CD19(+). 64% had CRS (G 3/4 13%/15%; Penn scale); 24% had neurologic events (G 3/4 9%/2%; CTCAE v4.03). 4 deaths ≤30 d: 2 early ALL progression, 1 fatal CRS with refractory ALL, 1 infection with multiorgan failure. Transgene level in peripheral blood: limited to no in vivo expansion in nonresponders (n=8) vs responders (n=42). Median duration of persistence (T last) of tisa was 272 d (R 27-379) in responders. In pts with CR/CRi, Cmax (geo-mean [CV%]) and median T last were 9260 (124) copies/µg DNA and 154 d (R 28-349), respectively, in pts who received INO as BT (n=6) vs 38,500 (215) and 273 d (R 27-379), respectively, in pts with no INO as BT (n=36). Conclusions: Outcomes in B2001X remain consistent with ELIANA. In pts with prior BLINA or INO as BT, a trend toward suboptimal outcomes was observed but should be interpreted with caution due to small n, short FU and potential confounding factors. Clinical trial information: NCT03123939. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".