Application of Soehendra sent retriever in patients with chronic pancreatitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Soehendra stent retriever for chronic pancreatitis patients with strictures of pancreatic duct.Methods Between January 2010 and October 2012,chronic pancreatitis patients with strictures of pancreatic duct underwent ERCP in Department of Endoscopy,General Hospital of Shenyang Command,and dilation was first attempted by using a dilating catheter.If the stricture could not be traversed,the Soehendra stent retriever was inserted over the wire to dilate the stricture.Results Two handreds and seven patients were included and 11 (3.7％) patients underwent Soehendra stent retriever dilation after failure of dilating catheter.Among the 11 patients,there were 7 men and 4 women with a mean age of 53 ± 3 years old (range 31 ～ 74).ERCP showed 9 cases of pancreatic head stricture,2 cases of pancreatic body stricture,and one patient was complicated with pancreatic pseudocysts.The Soehendra stent retriever was successfully used to dilate the stricture in all patients,and no complication occurred.The VAS pain score was decreased from 3.78 ± 0.83 to 1.56 ± 0.73 (t =6.03,P =0.00).Conclusions Soehendra stent retriever is safe and effective for pancreatic duct strictures dilation. Key words: Chronic pancreatitis; Soehendra stent retriever; Cholangiopancreatography,endoscopic retrograde; Pancreatic duct stricture; Dilatation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".