MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of hyperbaric oxygen combined with memantine hydrochloride in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

2019· article· no· W3029633246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qianrong Wu, Wei Huang, Houmei Tang, Lan-bo Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Naut Med & Hyperbar Med · 2019
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemantineMedicineHyperbaric oxygenHydrochlorideMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineAdverse effectAnesthesiaCognitive impairmentGastroenterologyDiseaseDementiaChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the effects of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) combined with memantine hydrochloride in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and its impact on the levels of serum SOD and NSE. Methods Eighty-eight patients with Alzheimer's disease admitted to our hospital from June 2015 to June 2018 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into the combined group and the control group, in accordance with different treatment methods. The control group was treated with memantine hydrochloride, while the combined group was treated with HBO coupled with memantine hydrochloride. After 8 weeks of treatment, the clinical effects were compared between the patients of the 2 groups. Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) were used to assess the cognitive status of the patients. The changes of serum SOD and NSE levels were compared and adverse reactions of the 2 groups were analyzed for the patients of the 2 groups. Results The total effective rate of the combined group (84.09%) was obviously higher than that of the control group (63.64%) (χ2 = 4.768, P=0.029). After treatment, the scores of MMSE and MoCA in the combined group were (21.42 ±1.15) and (25.46±1.39) respectively, while those in the control group were (18.37 ±1.05) and (22.31±1.22) respectively (all P<0.05). Following treatment, the serum SOD levels of the 2 groups all increased, and the serum NSE level decreased (P<0.05). No significant significance could be noticed in the rate of adverse reactions, when comparisons were made between the 2 groups (χ2=0.067, P=0.769). Conclusion HBO combined with memantine hydrochloride in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease has good clinical efficacy, and could significantly improve the cognitive function of the patients, and increase serum SOD level, reduce NSE level and alleviate oxidative stress injury in the patients. Key words: Hyperbaric oxygen; Memantine hydrochloride; Alzheimer's disease; Superoxide dismutase; Neuron-specific enolase

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J Naut Med & Hyperbar MedSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207