MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029659947 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40647-9_3

Agricultural Research and Innovation: Disruptive Technologies and Value-Chain Development in Africa

2020· book-chapter· en· W3029659947 on OpenAlexaff
Korbla P. Puplampu, George Owusu Essegbey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational political economy series · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureBusinessContext (archaeology)Production (economics)Relevance (law)Value (mathematics)Agricultural productivityMarketingValue chainAgricultural developmentAgribusinessDisruptive innovationIndustrial organizationSupply chainEconomicsPolitical scienceGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agricultural research plays a major role in any system of agricultural organization. It not only offers new knowledge to end users in production and marketing, but also innovative products for consumers. Innovation is concerned with new changes in agricultural organization, either from agricultural research or technology. The relationship between agricultural research and innovation has significant implications for value-chain development. With disruptive technology as an anchor, this chapter examines the agricultural research and innovation landscape in Africa. Specific attention will be paid to the policy and institutional capacity imperatives and how disruptive technologies can deepen the role of value-chain development for production, marketing and consumption systems. The chapter will draw on relevant illustrative material from other parts of the global South and discuss their relevance for the African context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational political economy seriesSame topicInnovation and Socioeconomic DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207