MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029674024 · doi:10.1113/ep088637

Impact of passive heat acclimation on markers of kidney function during heat stress

2020· article· en· W3029674024 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicholas Ravanelli, Hadiatou Barry, Zachary J. Schlader, Daniel Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsAcclimatizationRenal functionHeat stressUrineCreatinineChemistryAlbuminuriaInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyAnimal scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Does passive heat acclimation alter glomerular filtration rate and urine‐concentrating ability in response to passive heat stress? What is the main finding and its importance? Glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged after passive heat stress, and heat acclimation did not alter this response. However, heat acclimation mitigated the reduction in urine‐concentrating ability and reduced the incidence of albuminuria in young healthy adults after passive heat stress. Collectively, these results suggest that passive heat acclimation might improve structural integrity and reduce glomerular permeability during passive heat stress. Abstract Little is known about the effect of heat acclimation on kidney function during heat stress. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of passive heat stress and subsequent passive heat acclimation on markers of kidney function. Twelve healthy adults (seven men and five women; 26 ± 5 years of age; 72.7 ± 8.6 kg; 172.4 ± 7.5 cm) underwent passive heat stress before and after a 7 day controlled hyperthermia heat acclimation protocol. The impact of passive heat exposure on urine and serum markers of kidney function was evaluated before and after heat acclimation. Glomerular filtration rate, determined from creatinine clearance, was unchanged with passive heat stress before (pre, 133 ± 41 ml min −1 ; post, 127 ± 51 ml min −1 ; P = 0.99) and after (pre, 129 ± 46 ml min −1 ; post, 130 ± 36 ml min −1 ; P = 0.99) heat acclimation. The urine‐to‐serum osmolality ratio was reduced after passive heating ( P < 0.01), but heat acclimation did not alter this response. In comparison to baseline, free water clearance was greater after passive heating before (pre, −0.86 ± 0.67 ml min −1 ; post, 0.40 ± 1.01 ml min −1 ; P < 0.01) but not after (pre, −0.16 ± 0.57 ml min −1 ; post, 0.76 ± 1.2 ml min −1 ; P = 0.11) heat acclimation. Furthermore, passive heating increased the fractional excretion rate of potassium ( P < 0.03) but not sodium ( P = 0.13) or chloride ( P = 0.20). Lastly, heat acclimation reduced the fractional incidence of albuminuria after passive heating (before, 58 ± 51%; after, 8 ± 29%; P = 0.03). Collectively, these results demonstrate that passive heat stress does not alter the glomerular filtration rate. However, heat acclimation might improve urine‐concentrating ability and filtration within the glomerulus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207