Effects of alprostadil combined with mouse nerve growth factor on serum homocysteine, hypersensitive C-reactive protein and antioxidant capacity in patients with type 2 diabetic neuropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effects of alprostadil combined with rat nerve growth factor on serum homocysteine(Hcy), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP)and antioxidant capacity in patients with type 2 diabetic neuropathy. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 128 patients with type 2 diabetic neuropathy who were admitted from April 2016 to April 2019, 75 males and 53 females, aged(61.13±8.92)years, and the age range was 34 to 78 years.The patients were divided into alprostadil group(n=37), rat nerve growth factor group(n=42), and combined treatment group(n=49)according to different medication methods.Three groups of patients were treated with Toronto peripheral neuropathy score(TCSS )and visual simulation score(VAS); the sensory(SCV)and motor potential(MCV)of the median, tibial, and gastrocnemius nerves were measured using a full-function evoked potentiometer; Hcy, hs-CRP and antioxidant indicators malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase(SOD)levels. Results After treatment, the TCSS and VAS of the combined treatment group[(3.15±0.84)points, (1.35±1.09)points]were significantly lower than those of the alprostadil group[(7.05±1.13)points, (2.13±0.42)points], and the rat nerve Growth factor group[(6.82±1.27)points, (2.05±0.36)points]; SCV in median nerve, tibia nerve, and lower gastrocnemius nerve of the combined treatment group[(49.31±4.15)m/s, (49.15±4.03)m/s, (55.09 4.28)m/s], MCV[(57.84±4.75)m/s, (47.85±4.13)m/s, (48.29±4.35)m/s]were all higher than the alprostadil group[(45.81±3.71)m/s, (45.95±3.88)m/s, (44.07±3.69)m/s, (48.08±4.58)m/s, (39.14±3.04)m/s, (41.04±3.88)m/s]and rat nerve growth factor group[(44.92±3.59)m/s, (48.08±3.92)m/s, (49.27±4.12)m/s, (54.92±4.61)m/s, (43.55±3.92)m/s, (44.27±3.69)m/s]; Hcy, hs-CRP, malondialdehyde, and SOD levels in the combined treatment group[(18.73±3.62)μmol/L, (6.21±1.06)mg/L, (4.09±0.62)mmol/ml, (55.77±28.83)nU/ml]are significantly lower than the alprostadil group[(21.09±3.88)μmol/L, (9.52±1.14)mg/L, 6.01±0.85)mmol/ml, (76.17±30.05)nU/ml]and rat nerve growth factor group[(22.27±4.14)μmol/L, (10.04±1.39)mg/L, (6.14±0.88)mmol/ml, (78.34 ± 29.91)nU/ml], the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Alprostadil combined with mouse nerve growth factor has a better effect on the remission of type 2 diabetic neuropathy, and the effect of combined treatment is significantly better than that of single drug, which is worthy of reference in clinical practice. Key words: Alprostadil; Mouse nerve growth factor; Type 2 diabetic neuropathy; Antioxidant homocysteine; Hypersensitive C-reactive protein
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".