Effects of social-economic factors on self-care ability and general happiness in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the influence of social-economic factors on self-care ability and general well-being in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) . Methods Totally 75 adolescents with T1DM who were treated in Endocrinology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2014 to January 2016 were selected as the research objects, and the social-economic factors of their families were collected, which included education degree, career situation, yearly household income and citizenship. The levels of self-care ability and general happiness in adolescents with T1DM were researched by Diabetes Self-Care Scale (DSCS) and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH) , and the correlation between the social-economic factors and self-care ability, general happiness were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. Results In this study, the score of self-care ability of adolescents was (80.66±8.57) , in which 19 cases got good scores, 35 cases got general scores and 21 cases got poor scores; the score of general happiness was (34.02±4.99) , in which 23 cases got low scores, 26 cases got medium scores and 26 cases got high scores. The differences in parents' education degree, father's career situation, and yearly household income among T1DM adolescents with different self-care ability levels were statistically significant (P<0.01) ; the differences in parents' education degree, parents' career situation and yearly household income among T1DM adolescents with different general happiness levels was statistically significant (P<0.05) . Multiple linear regression showed that parents' education degree, father's career situation and yearly household income were influence factors of self-care ability in adolescents with T1DM (P<0.01) ; parents' education degree, parents' career situation and yearly household income were influencing factors for general well-being in adolescents with T1DM (P<0.01) . Conclusions The levels of self-care ability and general well-being in adolescents with T1DM are at medium level; their parents' education degree and yearly household income are the main influencing factors. Key words: Social-economic factors; Diabetes mellitus, type 1; Self-care ability; General well-being
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".