MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029799159

Double-Base Number System for Multi-Scalar Multiplications.

2008· preprint· en· W3029799159 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Doche, David Kohel, Francesco Sica

Bibliographic record

VenueIACR Cryptology ePrint Archive · 2008
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalar multiplicationScalar (mathematics)MathematicsRedundancy (engineering)Base (topology)AlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Joint Sparse Form is currently the standard represen-tation system to perform multi-scalar multiplications of the form [n]P + m[Q]. We introduce the concept of Joint Double-Base Chain, a general-ization of the Double-Base Number System to represent simultaneously n and m. This concept is relevant because of the high redundancy of Double-Base systems, which ensures that we can find a chain of reason-able length that uses exactly the same terms to compute both n and m. Furthermore, we discuss an algorithm to produce such a Joint Double-Base Chain. Because of its simplicity, this algorithm is straightforward to implement, efficient, and also quite easy to analyze. Namely, in our main result we show that the average number of terms in the expansion is less than 0.3945 log2 n. With respect to the Joint Sparse Form, this induces a reduction by more than 20 % of the number of additions. As a consequence, the total number of multiplications required for a scalar multiplications is minimal for our method, across all the methods using two precomputations, P +Q and P −Q. This is the case even with co-ordinate systems offering very cheap doublings, in contrast with recent results on scalar multiplications. Several variants are discussed, including methods using more precomputed points and a generalization relevant for Koblitz curves. Our second contribution is a new way to evaluate φ, the dual endomorphism of the Frobenius. Namely, we propose formulae to compute ±φ(P) with at most 2 multiplications and 2 squarings in F2d. This represents a speed-up of about 50 % with respect to the fastest techniques known. This has very concrete consequences on scalar and multi-scalar multiplications on Koblitz curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIACR Cryptology ePrint ArchiveSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207