Effect of hippocampal protection technique on improvement of cognitive dysfunction in patients undergoing whole brain radiotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effect of hippocampal protection on neurological cognitive dysfunction caused by whole brain radiotherapy. Methods A total of 98 patients received total brain radiotherapy, 60 patients in the protective hippocampus group and 38 patients in the conventional whole brain radiotherapy group. The difference of neurocognitive impairment in the two grups was assessed using the Montreal cognitive rating scale, and cognitive benefit of the protective hippocampus group was assessed using hippocampal protection techniques. Results There was no significant difference in baseline overall score between the hippocampal protection group and conventional whole-brain radiotherapy group, and the difference between the hippocampus protection group and the conventional whole brath group at 3, 6 and 12 months after radiotherapy was significant (P<0.05). Conclusions The hippocampal protection technique can reduce the cognitive dysfunction caused by whole brain radiotherapy and improve the quality of life of patients. Key words: Whole brain radiotherapy; Hippocampal protection; Cognitive function
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".