Intranasal dexmedetomidine prevents the emergence delirium in children after sevoflurane-based anesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether intranasal dexmedetomidine prevents the emergency delirium after sevoflurane-based anesthesia (ASA) in children.Methods Ninety children (ASA I,2 to 7years) undergoing elective tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy,were randomly divided into group D1 (intranasal dexmedemidine 1.0 μg/kg),group D2 (intranasal dexmedemidine 0.5 μg/kg),and group NS (intranasal normal saline).Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane (30 min after intranasal administration) and maintained with sevoflurane in 50/50％ O2/N2O.Heart rate (HR),blood pressure (BP),and hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored before intranasal administration to 2 hours after extubation.Time of operation and extubation were recorded.Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale,Modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (m-CHEOPS) Pain scale and the adverse effects were observed.Results The PAED scales of group D1 and Group D2 were significantly lower than group NS.No significant differences were found in hemodynamic and respiratory variables,pain scale,time of extubation and adverse effects among three groups.Conclusions Intranasal dexmedetomidine decreased the severity of emergence delirium after sevoflurane-based anesthesia in children without prolonging the time to extubate and affect hemodynamics and respiratory variables. Key words: Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage ; Administration, intranasal ; Anesthesia recovery period; Mood disorders/prevention & control; Child
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".