MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3029898558 · doi:10.1101/2020.05.28.120915

The Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome gene <i>FOXC1</i> contributes to left-right patterning

2020· preprint· en· W3029898558 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Chrystal, Curtis R. French, Francesca Jean, Serhiy Havrylov, Suey van Baarle, Ann-Marie Peturson, Pengfei Xu, J. Gage Crump, David B. Pilgrim, Ordan J. Lehmann, Andrew J. Waskiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of AlbertaWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteChildren's Health Research InstituteHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsZebrafishLateral plate mesodermPITX2BiologyPenetranceNODALGeneticsAnatomySOX9MesodermTranscription factorPhenotypeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Normal body situs requires precise spatiotemporal expression of the Nodal-Lefty-Pitx2 cascade in the lateral plate mesoderm. The ultimate output of this patterning is establishment of the left-right axis, which provides vital cues for correct organ formation and function. Mutations, deletions and duplications in PITX2 and FOXC1 lead to the rare genetic disease Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS). While situs defects are not a recognised feature of ARS, partial penetrance of cardiac septal defects and valve incompetence is observed; both of these congenital heart defects (CHDs) also occur following disruption of left-right patterning. Here we investigated whether foxc1 genes have a critical role in specifying organ situs. We demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 generated mutants for the zebrafish paralogs foxc1a and foxc1b recapitulate ARS phenotypes including craniofacial dysmorphism, hydrocephalus and intracranial haemorrhage. Furthermore, foxc1a -/- ; foxc1b -/- mutant animals display cardiac and gut situs defects. Modelling FOXC1 duplication by transient mRNA overexpression revealed that increased foxc1 dosage also results in organ situs defects. Analysis of known left-right patterning genes revealed a loss in expression of the NODAL antagonist lefty2 in the lateral plate mesoderm. Consistently, LEFTY2 mutations are known to cause human cardiac situs defects. Our data reveal a novel role for the forkhead-box transcription factor foxc1 in patterning of the left-right axis, and provide a plausible mechanism for the incidence of congenital heart defects in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome patients. Author Summary This manuscript investigates the functional consequences of abrogating the activity of Foxc1 (Forkhead Box C1). We demonstrate that loss of zebrafish foxc1a and foxc1b results in phenotypes that resemble human patients with deletions in the FOXC1 locus. Notably, such phenotypes include alterations to the morphology of the heart. Investigations into the mechanisms underlying this phenotype led to the discovery that Foxc1 functions as a regulator of left-right patterning. Most components of left-right specification function normally in foxc1a/b mutants, but there is a pronounced loss of lefty2 , a known inhibitor of Nodal signaling. This supports a model in which Foxc1 regulates situs of the heart via the regulation of Lefty2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207