Nematic ordering of worm-like polymers near an interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase behavior of semi-flexible polymers is integral to various contexts, from materials science to biophysics, many of which utilize or require specific confinement geometries as well as the orientational behavior of the polymers. Inspired by collagen assembly, we study the orientational ordering of semi-flexible polymers, modeled as Maier-Saupe worm-like chains, using self-consistent field theory. We first examine the bulk behavior of these polymers, locating the isotropic-nematic transition and delineating the limit of stability of the isotropic and nematic phases. This effort explains how nematic ordering emerges from the isotropic phase and offers insight into how different (e.g., mono-domain vs multi-domain) nematic phases form. We then clarify the influence of planar confinement on the nematic ordering of the polymers. We find that while the presence of a single confining wall does not shift the location of nematic transition, it aligns the polymers in parallel to the wall; above the onset of nematic transition, this preference tends to propagate into the bulk phase. Introducing a second, perpendicular, wall leads to a nematic phase that is parallel to both walls, allowing the ordering direction to be uniquely set by the geometry of the experimental setup. The advantage of wall-confinement is that it can be used to propagate mono-domain nematic phases into the bulk phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".