Clinical effect of 595 nm tunable pulsed pulsed dye laser treatment of fresh trauma scars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of 595 nm tunable pulsed dye laser (PDL) in treating fresh trauma scars. Methods 85 patients had been selected, of which, 117 sites were treated with a 595 nm tunable PDL one time or two times at a fluence of 7-15 J/cm2 and pulse widths of 1.5-3 ms, 7 mm spot size. Nursing skill of burn wound was also used on treatment area after laser treatment. Scars were evaluated for melanin, height, vascularity and pliability using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) before treatment and after the last treatment 8weeks. Results Total score of 117 sites decreased from (8.30±2.63) to (2.70±1.25), melanin decreased from (1.60±0.84) to (0.60±0.97), height decreased from (1.30±0.82) to (0.40±0.51), vascularity decreased from (2.40±0.52) to (0.40±0.52), pliability decreased from (2.80±1.32) to (1.30±0.48), with statistical significance between before treatment and after treatment (P<0.05). Conclusions 595 nm tunable pulsed dye laser appears to have a beneficial clinical effect on patient's fresh trauma scar. Key words: Lasers, dye; Laser therapy; Ointments; Cicatrix
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".