Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the incoming communication system, especially for the battery constrained Internet of Things devices, consumption of power resources will be a critical performance metric. This point shows importance when throughput minimal requirement and interference limit have been carried out. This paper investigates such a power allocation problem in a multiple-parallel-channel wireless system to minimize the sum power consumed by the entire system, while meeting the sum power constrains for each group of channels and the whole system as well as meeting the throughput constraints for each of the groups and the system. Sum power minimization itself is also a key issue for margin-adaptive loading. Resorting to geometric concepts, an algorithm named as the group virtual bottom power water-filling (GVB-PWF) is proposed to solve the problem, including the large-scale problems, which computes the exact solution with a low degree of the polynomial computational complexity. Optimality of the proposed algorithm is also proved strictly. To the best of our knowledge, no prior algorithm in the open literature offered such an optimal solution to the proposed problem, with the merit of exactness and efficiency. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed power allocation algorithm uses less power about 25%, compared with the popular primal-dual interior-point method with the same amount of computations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".