Advanced glycosylation end products and cognitive functional impairment in the elderly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the relationship between advanced glycosylation end products (AGEs) and cognitive functional impairment in the elderly. Methods The present investigation enrolled 270 outpatients aged 60 years and above who had presented to the Department of Neurology or Health Check-up Center,Zhujiang Hospital.They were divided into a normal cognition group (n=139) and a cognitive impairment group (n=131) according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Their fasting serum was collected to measure AGEs content by fluorimetry in both groups.Associations between their MoCA scores and their age,gender,education and AGEs content were analyzed. Results The AGEs contents were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P＞0.05).The MoCA scores or the detectable rates of cognitive impairment were significantly different among different age groups (P＜0.05),but not between genders (P＞0.05).The detectable rates of cognitive impairment were significantly different among subjects with different educational levels (P＜0.05).Conclusions Age and educational level are significant factors associated with cognitive impairment in the elderly population.Since the serum AGEs level is not linked to the impaired cognitive function in the elderly,it cannot be used as a laboratory index in early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Key words: Alzheimer's disease; Montreal cognitive assessment; Advanced glycosylation end products
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".