MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Application value of Calgary-Cambridge Guide joint case teaching in the course of community health education and health promotion

2019· article· en· W3030186411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hongyu Xin

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo jiceng yiyao · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePromotion (chess)Course (navigation)Value (mathematics)Joint (building)Health educationMedical educationGerontologyNursingCivil engineeringPublic healthEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的 探讨卡尔加里-剑桥指南联合案例教学在《社区护理学》课程中的应用价值。 方法 选择在湖州市中心医院实习的2016级四年制护理本科学生120名为研究对象,按照随机抽签法分为观察组和对照组60名,在《社区护理学》课程讲解时分别采用卡尔加里-剑桥指南联合案例教学及传统教学法。比较两组成绩和实践表现评分。 结果 观察组的平均成绩、综合成绩优良率分别为(86.35±4.26)分、96.67%,明显高于对照组的(79.18±3.97)分、81.67%(t=9.538、χ2=6.988,均P<0.05)。观察组的理论知识、实践能力、应变能力、信息能力、思维能力、沟通能力等各项得分均高于对照组(t=9.642、10.521、10.795、8.055、6.135、7.296,均P<0.05)。 结论 卡尔加里-剑桥指南联合案例教学在《社区护理学》课程教学中,针对性强,能够增强学生的沟通技巧,具有可行性。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo jiceng yiyaoSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207