MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030391849 · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2694

Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

2020· article· en· W3030391849 on OpenAlex
Mark J. Brandt, Toon Kuppens, Russell Spears, Luca Andrighetto, Frédérique Autin, Peter Babinčák, Constantina Badea, Jaechang Bae, Anatolia Batruch, Julia C. Becker, Konrad Bocian, Bojana Bodroža, David Bourguignon, Marcin Bukowski, Fabrizio Butera, Sarah E. Butler, Xenia Chryssochoou, Paul Conway, Jarret T. Crawford, Jean‐Claude Croizet, Soledad de Lemus, Juliane Degner, Piotr Dragon, Federica Durante, Matthew J. Easterbrook, Iniobong Essien, Joseph P. Forgas, Roberto González, Sylvie Graf, Peter Haľama, Gyuseog Han, Ryan Y. Hong, Petr Houdek, Eric R. Igou, Yoel Inbar, Jolanda Jetten, William Jiménez‐Leal, Gloria Jiménez‐Moya, Jaya Kumar Karunagharan, Anna Kende, Maria Korzh, Simon M. Laham, Joris Lammers, Li Hong Idris Lim, Antony S. R. Manstead, Janko Međedović, Zachary J. Melton, Matt Motyl, Spyridoula Ntani, Chuma Kevin Owuamalam, Müjde Peker, Michael J. Platow, JP Prims, Christine Reyna, Mark Rubin, Rim Saab, Sindhuja Sankaran, Lee Shepherd, Chris G. Sibley, Agata Sobków, Bram Spruyt, Pernille Stroebaek, Nebi Sümer, Joseph Sweetman, Cátia P. Teixeira, Claudia Toma, Adrienn Ujhelyi, Jojanneke van der Toorn, Alain Van Hiel, Alejandro Vásquez‐Echeverría, Alexandra Vázquez, Michelangelo Vianello, Marek Vranka, Vincent Yzerbyt, Jennifer L. Zimmerman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Social Psychology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Intergroup Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCentro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión SocialMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadH2020 European Research CouncilFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoAkademie Věd České RepublikyGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsLegitimacyPsychologySocial psychologyPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The relationships between subjective status and perceived legitimacy are important for understanding the extent to which people with low status are complicit in their oppression. We use novel data from 66 samples and 30 countries ( N = 12,788) and find that people with higher status see the social system as more legitimate than those with lower status, but there is variation across people and countries. The association between subjective status and perceived legitimacy was never negative at any levels of eight moderator variables, although the positive association was sometimes reduced. Although not always consistent with hypotheses, group identification, self‐esteem, and beliefs in social mobility were all associated with perceived legitimacy among people who have low subjective status. These findings enrich our understanding of the relationship between social status and legitimacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it