MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030425032 · doi:10.1145/3339825.3391868

Resource optimization through hierarchical SDN-enabled inter data center network for cloud gaming

2020· article· en· W3030425032 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Amiri, Hussein Al Osman, Shervin Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingQuality of experienceDistributed computingNetwork delayQuality of serviceComputer networkOptimization problemRendering (computer graphics)Bandwidth (computing)Data center

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gaming on demand is an emerging service that combines techniques from Cloud Computing and Online Gaming. This new paradigm is garnering prominence in the gaming industry and leading to a new "anywhere and anytime" online gaming model. Despite its advantages, cloud gaming's Quality of Experience (QoE) is challenged by high and varying end-to-end communication delay. Since the significant part of the computational processing, including game rendering and video compression, is performed on the cloud, properly allocating game requests to the geographically distributed data centers (DCs) can lead to QoE improvements resulting from lower delays. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical Software Defined Network (SDN) controller architecture to near-optimally allocate a gaming session to a DC while minimizing network delay and maximizing bandwidth utilization. To do so, we formulate an optimization problem, and propose the Online Convex Optimization (OCO) as a practical solution. Simulation results indicate that the proposed method can provide close-to-optimal solutions, and outperforms classic offline techniques e.g. Lagrangean relaxation. In addition, the proposed model improves the bandwidth utilization of DCs, and reduces end-to-end delay and delay variation by gamers. As a byproduct, our proposed method also achieves better fairness among multiple competing players in comparison with existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207