MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Objective sleep structure and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder

2013· article· en· W3030531352 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yun Shen, Chengjie Mao, Kangping Xiong, Yan Gong, Fei Han, Weidong Hu, Junying Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Neurol · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysomnographyNon-rapid eye movement sleepRapid eye movement sleepREM sleep behavior disorderSlow-wave sleepSleep (system call)Eye movementCognitionPsychologySleep StagesSleep disorderMedicineAudiologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaApneaOphthalmologyPsychiatryElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate the sleep structure and cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD),and then explore the correlation between sleep structure and cognitive function in PD patients with RBD. Methods It was a cross-sectional study.Ninety-seven patients in our sleep center,including 39 PD patients with RBD and 21 age-and sex-matched idiopathic RBD (iRBD) patients (control group),37 PD patients without RBD (control group),underwent video-polysomnography to acquire sleep parameters. Cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) on the same day.A multiple linear regression model was used to find the score of cognition correlated with sleep structure. Results (1) The sleep efficiency,total sleep time,non-rapid eye movement (NREM) 2 and REM sleep time were all significantly decreased in PD patients with RBD than those in iRBD patients (60.9%±16.9% vs 77.8%±16.9%,(329.7±96.5) min vs (397.1±88.9) min,(127.6±67.6) min vs (188.0±94.7) min,(45.3±33.2) min vs (70.6±25.9) min,all P<0.05),respectively.There were no significant differences of these above parameters compared to PD patients without RBD (61.3%±21.7%,(324.9±134.6) min,(132.6±65.6) min,(47.1±31.9) min).There was no statistical significance in sleep latency,REM-sleep latency,NREM1 time,the percentage of slow wave sleep,oxygen desaturation index,apnea hyponea index and periodic leg movement in sleep among three groups. (2) PD patients with RBD had the lowest MoCA scores.The score of visuospatial and executive function in PD patients with RBD was lower than that in iRBD (3.8±1.1 vs 4.4±0.7; F=3.426,P<0.05). (3) Multiple linear regression analysis showed that there was correlation between the score of visuospatial and executive functions and the course of RBD,sleep efficiency and NREM2 in PD patients with RBD. Conclusions The PD patients with RBD have the worst sleep efficiency and cognitive function,the shortest total sleep time,NREM2 and REM sleep time.The cognitive impairment may be correlated with the change of sleep structure. Key words: Parkinson’s disease; REM sleep behavior disorder; Polysomnography; Cognition

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J NeurolSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207