A clinical study on the pain following brachial plexus injury and its correlative factors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the characteristic and correlative factors of pain following traumatic brachial plexus injury and the impact of surgery on pain. Methods This study was a prospective, self-controlled study. Each enrolled patient was asked to respond to the revised short form McGill pain (SF-MPQ-2) and neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) questionnaire before and after surgery. Multiple factors analysis on pain was carried out and the effect of surgery on pain was evaluated. Results The total number of the study was 100 patients. Both of the SF-MPQ-2 38.33±30.38 and NPSI 15.62±14.84 scores after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery SF-MPQ-2 50.13±36.55; NPSI 20.24±16.84. The highest score appeared in affective descriptors of the four subscales in SF-MPQ-2 and the score of paresthesia was the highest in the 5 divisions of NPSI, no matter before or after surgery. The postoperative scores of deep pain, evoked pain and paresthesia were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Preoperative pain was related to whether nerve continuity existed or not (SF-MPQ-2: r=-0.2198, P=0.0280; NPSI: r=-0.2322, P=0.0201). The postoperative SF-MPQ-2 and NPSI scores were significantly lower than preoperative scores in motorcycle accident and weight dropping groups. The SF-MPQ-2 and NPSI scores were the highest in global brachial plexus injury group before and after operation. The SF-MPQ-2 and NPSI scores in global brachial plexus injury group or upper and middle trunks injury group after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery. The postoperative SF-MPQ-2 and NPSI scores in nerve transfer or neurolysis group were significantly lower than preoperative scores. Conclusion In the study, according to SF-MPQ-2 and NPSI evaluation, affective descriptors and paresthesia accounted for the largest proportion in pain expression. Nerve transfer or neurolysis might have a positive effect on prognosis of neuropathic pain for traumatic brachial plexus injury. Surgery might relieve deep pain and evoked pain and paresthesia. Key words: Brachial plexus; Prospective studies; Neuropathic pain; SF-MPQ-2; NPSI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".