Non-Reciprocity View of the MIMO Antenna Arrays in Transmitting and Receiving Modes Using the Maximized Unique Receiving Pattern Theory Resulted by Angle-Wise Array Factor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new approach to employ MIMO array behavior in system design calculations by distinguishing the transmitting and receiving modes' characteristics is presented. It shows that the conventional array formulation complies merely with the transmitting mode behavior of MIMO arrays, while the newly proposed formulation eases the estimation of the receiving mode behavior by introducing the Angle Wise Array Factor (AWAF). A novel theory of “Non-reciprocity view of transmitting and receiving modes in MIMO arrays” is being discussed along with “Pattern non-uniqueness in transmitting mode” and “Pattern uniqueness in receiving mode” theories. The grating lobe definition is also re-introduced, proposing that this definition is supposed to be reserved merely for transmitting mode.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it