Estimation of elastic‐plastic strain response at two‐dimensional notches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract It is widely recognized that the accuracy of notch fatigue calculations can be improved significantly when those calculations are based on the elastic‐plastic response strain at the notch root, as opposed to the remotely applied loads or stresses. Two of the most widely used approximations for this response are Neuber's rule and Glinka's equivalent strain energy density method. In the present work, a survey of some of the many published evaluations of these methods was first conducted, and then, additional detailed comparisons with elastic‐plastic finite element analyses for a series of semicircular and V‐shaped notch configurations were performed. Based on the observed limitations of both the Neuber and Glinka approaches, and with the guidance of the elastic‐plastic finite element results, a new (and more robust) approach for the estimation of notch response strains is proposed. This approach calls for the definition of a generalized notch response curve (GNRC) , which is dependent on both the material stress–strain curve and the notch geometry. Once defined, the GNRC allows the determination of the response strain for any applied stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".