MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative study of basilar artery implanted with intracranial stent between beagle dogs and labrador dogs

2017· article· en· W3030850662 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua shiyan waike zazhi · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeagleBasilar arteryMedicineCerebral arteriesFissipediaStentArteryCarnivoraAnterior cerebral arteryMiddle cerebral arteryInternal medicineIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To compare the differences of the intracranial vascular diameter and neurological function between beagle and labrador dogs using angiography and neurological function evaluation, and explore the feasibility of labrador dogs for experimental study of basilar artery implanted with intracranial stent. Methods A total of 12 dogs, including 6 beagle dogs (beagle group) and 6 labrador dogs (labrador group) were subjected to general anesthesia. All dogs were examined with cerebral angiography. The diameters of the internal cerebral arteries (ICA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), rostral cerebral artery (RCA) and basilar artery (BA) were measured. The weight of dogs and the diameter of arteries were statistically analyzed. The differences in the diameters were compared between the two groups. The neurological function scores were compared between the two groups before and after the stent implantation. Results No obvious variations in the cerebrovascular structure was found in these dogs. The diameters of the ICA, MCA, RCA and BA in beagle group were (1.27±0.04), (0.96±0.05), (0.55±0.08) and (1.35±0.07) mm, and those in labrador group were (1.87±0.06), (1.34±0.07), (0.86±0.06) and (1.65±0.04) mm, respectively. The neurological function scores after the stent implantation in beagle group and labrador group were (5.50±0.73) and (2.16±0.19) respectively. The diameter of the ICA, MCA, RCA and BA was significantly larger in labrador dogs than that in beagle dogs (t=7.367, 5.485, 4.872, 4.328, P=0.000, 0.000, 0.001, 0.001). The neurological function scores after the stent implantation in labrador dogs were less than those in beagle dogs (t=9.579, P=0.000). Conclusion There are few variations of the diameter of intracranial vessels in labrador dogs. The diameter of basilar artery was larger in labrador dogs than that in beagle dogs. The abrador dogs are more suitable for experimental study of basilar artery implanted with intracranial stent than the beagle dogs. Key words: Beagle dogs; Labrador dogs; Basilar artery; Stent implantation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it