The analgesic effect of combination of low-flow rate oxygen inhalation with intravenous mannitolinjection for patients after nasal operation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To describe the analgesic effect of low-flow rate oxygen inhalation with intravenous mannitol injection for patients after nasal operation and seek for effective method for allevia-tion of pain.Methods 160 patients were divided into group A,B,C and D with 40 cases in each group.Group A received intravenous injection of 125 ml of 20%mannitol and group B got low-flow rate oxygen inhalation through nasal canulas.While group C were given the combination of treatment in that of group A and group B.Group D was named the control group and only adopted routine nursing.The pain alleviation effect was observed by McGill pain evaluation method.Results The score of pain in group C was lower than those in group A and B.While the scores of pain in group A and B were lower than that in group D(P<0.01).Conclusion The nasal swelling in group C lightened compared with those of group B (P<0.01)and group A(P<0.05).The nasal swelling in group A was lighter than that of group D but no difference Was seen between group B and group D Key words: Nasal operation; Analgesia; Mannitol; Oxygen inhalation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it