MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3030970034 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23818

Isothermal crystallization of <scp>PLA</scp>: Nucleation density and growth rates of <i>α</i> and <i>α</i>' phases

2020· article· en· W3030970034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fabiana Foglia, Annarita De Meo, Valentina Iozzino, Valentina Volpe, Roberto Pantani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallizationNucleationKineticsIsothermal processMaterials scienceChemical engineeringThermodynamicsAmorphous solidPolymerCrystallographyChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract From a technological point of view, poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is one of the most important polymers produced from renewable sources, due to its versatility, relatively acceptable processability, and low cost. However, a significant limitation exists in its slow crystallization kinetics, which results in amorphous products having low mechanical properties and thermal resistance. For this reason, quantitative knowledge of the phenomenon of crystallization kinetics is fundamental. In this work, the crystallization kinetics in quiescent conditions of a commercial grade of PLA was analyzed in terms of nucleation and growth rates by direct morphological observations at different crystallization temperatures (T c ) and by calorimetric analysis in isothermal and non‐isothermal conditions. The optical analysis showed a spherulitic morphology with radial growth of the lamellae. The analysis of the growth rate evidenced the α/α'‐crystals polymorphism with a transition temperature of ~120°C. Based on experimental observation, the crystallization kinetics of the two crystalline phases were assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207