Long-term outcomes of pediatric traumatic cataracts and retinal detachments due to self-inflicted injuries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the characteristics and longitudinal visual outcomes of traumatic cataracts and retinal detachments in children with self-inflicted injury. METHODS: A retrospective case series of pediatric patients at a tertiary care center who sustained ocular trauma due to self-inflicted injury between 2000 and 2014. RESULTS: A total of 11 children, all with an intellectual disability and a mean age of 10 ± 4.8 years (range, 2.8-16.2), were identified with traumatic cataract secondary to ocular self-inflicted injury over the study period. Five eyes had a concurrent unilateral retinal detachment. Over the course of follow-up, one additional eye developed a cataract and five eyes developed a retinal detachment. Patients underwent an average of 2.5 ± 2.3 procedures and 17.1 ± 10.7 eye examinations over 11.7 ± 4.2 years of follow-up; 36% required general anesthesia for examination. Visual acuity was improved or preserved in 77% of the eyes that underwent surgical interventions, but was worse in the remaining cases due to development of traumatic retinal detachment. The use of protective helmets, eye shields, and immobilizing orthoses were essential in management of active self-inflicted injury. CONCLUSION: Traumatic cataracts and retinal detachments due to self-inflicted injury may cause severe visual loss. Visual prognosis although poor in children with severe intellectual disabilities may be optimized with risk awareness for early detection and customized interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".