Michel Corbillon (dir.), Suppléance familiale, Nouvelles approches, nouvelles pratiques Ed. Matrice, coll. Points d’appui, 2001, 240 pages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recherches variees, issues de disciplines diverses, menees en Europe autour de l’education en internat, l’accueil familial et les alternatives au placement d’enfants et de jeunes en situation difficile. Les auteurs des quinze textes retenus, au terme d’une selection parmi ceux presentes au sixieme Congres de l’EUSARF - Universite Paris X-Nanterre, septembre 1998 – font etat des savoirs actuels et des evolutions dans le domaine de la suppleance familiale. Six pays sont representes dans cette selection : la France (4 textes), la Grande-Bretagne (4 textes), les Pays-Bas (3 textes), le Quebec, Canada (1 texte), l’Italie (1 texte), la Pologne (1 texte), et les Etats-Unis (1 texte) Quatre thematiques structurent l’ouvrage : - les dimensions institutionnelles et les innovations ; - la suppleance familiale interrogee par la recherche ; - les effets des prises en charge ; - les relations familiales et le reseau social. Les communications faites au Congres, et retenues dans l’ouvrage, presentent des degres tres variables de technicite. Certaines permettent de mesurer mieux que d’autres les drames humains rencontres lors d’une approche de ce delicat probleme de la suppleance familiale. Dans leur apparente secheresse, les etudes plus statistiques ont pour elle l’espoir d’influencer les decideurs - politiques ou sociaux - ayant en charge cet aspect de la vie sociale. Le presentateur de l’ouvrage signale lui-meme les difficultes rencontrees par les traducteurs : assurer la meilleure adequ
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".