An epidemiological study for no-suicide self-injury behavior of 1463 junior school students in Dalian city
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To find incidence rate of no-suicide self injury (NSSI) of junior school students in Dalian city, and to provide some evidences for interventions for them. Methods Randomly drawn out 1463 junior school students were served as study objects. All objects were evaluated with Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory(OSI) and self-made investigate questionnaire, 75 no-suicide self-injury were screening out. Results The incidence ratio of NSSI of junior school students was 5.4%, there were no significant different between the male and female students. The highest incidence ratio was found at 13 years old. The average age for first-time self-harm was (12.24±1.344) years old. There were no significant different between the male and the female students(t=-1.415, P=0.163); Cutting Skin was the most common way of NSSI (12.0%); Ideation of 80% of the NSSI was from their Own Idea . 2.7% of the NSSI can Feel Relief through NSSI behavior.93% of NSSI was to regulate their mood. 100% students of NSSI against NSSI behavior by Reading Books or Listening Music , in which 60% of NSSI believe the method was helpful to relax their mind. 78.5% of the NSSI resisted NSSI behavior by Watching TV or Playing Games , but they did not get enough effects. 60% NSSI considered themselves without the need to treat. 41.3% of NSSI had never been to treat. 2.5% of NSSI went to hospital for the wound. Conclusion NSSI is often be found in junior school students, and highest ratio is at 13 years old. The most common method of NSSI is Cutting Skin . More NSSI aim is to release their emotion, and self-injury behavior accordance with their inner thoughts.NSSI behavior often is secret, and reading and listening to music is cut off from the relative effective way to conduct.NSSI are seldom to initiative doctor, and education organ, parents and society in a three-dimensional one of the system is necessary. Key words: No-suicide self-injury; Junior; Ottawa self-injury inventory; Epidemiology
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".