The effect of PDCA cycle - type home nursing intervention on subjective well - being and life quality of coronary heart disease patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To probe into the effect of PDCA cycle type home nursing intervention on subjective well - being and life quality of coronary heart disease patients. Methods A total of 130 coronary heart disease patients were divided into observation group of 65 patients ( patients who live family bed) and the control group of 65 patients (for the special out - patient referral in patients with chronic diseases), the observation group was given home care using PDCA cycle implementation of the intervention, control group was given rourine community care interventions. The sense of subjective well - being of patients was tested by Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale (MUNSH), the quality of life (QOL) was assessed the quality of life scale (SF-36) developed by the American Medical Association. Results After home nursing intervention, the well - being score and quality of life score of observation group were significantly improved, and better than those of the control group. Conclusions The application of PDCA cycle of the implementation of home health nursing interventions can improve subjective well - being and quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease, and improve patients' outcomes and lower recurrence rate. Key words: Coronary heart disease; PDCA cycle; Home nursing; Well- being; Quality of life
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".