Recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of clinical outcomes by treatment modality including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e18033 Background: Recurrent VSCC carries a poor prognosis, but real-world data on outcomes with standard treatment options are lacking. Specifically, progression free survival (PFS) in recurrent VSCC is ill-defined which is problematic for the design of clinical trials with novel therapies. We aim to address the paucity of outcome data in recurrent VSCC and to compare PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) undergoing surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or a combination of these treatments. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 246 pts from 2000-2018 diagnosed with VSCC treated at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center and 61 pts with recurrent disease. Data collected included patient demographics, tumour characteristics, recurrence pattern, and treatment modality (surgery only, surgery with chemotherapy, surgery with radiation, surgery with chemoradiation, chemoradiation only, chemotherapy only, or radiation only). Descriptive statistical analysis is reported. Results: Among all study pts, the stage distribution was stage I: 28%, II: 19%, III: 43% and IV: 10%. 61% of pts had one recurrence, 36% had two recurrences, and 3% had three recurrences. The 5-year survival rate was 78% for non-recurrent VSCC vs. 33% for recurrent cases. The median OS for all recurrent and non-recurrent cases was 3.7 years and 13.5 years, respectively. For primary treatment, 87% underwent surgical treatment, of which 60% also had radiation or chemoradiation. The most common treatments for first recurrence were: surgery (25%), radiation (20%), no treatment (16%) and chemotherapy (14%), and for second recurrence: no treatment (50%), radiation (25%), surgery (17%) and chemotherapy (8%). The median PFS after primary treatment and after first and second recurrences were 8.7, 5.3 and 1.4 months (mo), respectively, with no significant difference between treatment regimens. However, when grouped (surgery with or without chemotherapy, radiation or chemoradiation vs. non-surgical management), there was a significant PFS benefit for surgical (15.6 mo) over non-surgical management (0.7 mo) in the treatment of a second recurrence (p = 0.05). Conclusions: At our centre, surgery and radiation have been the mainstay of treatment for recurrent VSCC with particular advantage of surgery in the treatment of a second recurrence. Our study establishes a baseline for VSCC outcomes following standard treatment. Accurate PFS data is an important outcome for the design of future studies in recurrent VSCC with new drug therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".