MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clonal lineage analysis of CLL research samples by IGH chain sequencing to reveal novel CLL subgroups defined by ongoing class-switch recombination and somatic hypermutation.

2020· article· en· W3031257206 on OpenAlexaff
Timothy J. Looney, Graeme Quest, Harriet Feilotter, Zadie Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityKingston General Hospital
FundersThermo Fisher Scientific
KeywordsSomatic hypermutationImmunoglobulin class switchingBiologyGeneticsChronic lymphocytic leukemiabreakpoint cluster regionMolecular biologyGeneB cellAntibodyLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e20001 Background: B cell somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR) are mechanistically related but distinct processes requiring precisely targeted generation and repair of single and double strand DNA breaks. Within the context of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the presence of ongoing SHM or CSR may reveal the functionality of DNA damage repair pathways, with potential relevance to therapeutic strategies involving the generation of DNA breaks or inhibition of DNA repair machinery. Here we apply clonal lineage analysis of IGH chain sequencing data to evaluate CSR and SHM in a cohort of CLL and splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) research samples. We present evidence of ongoing CSR and SHM in a significant subset of samples. Methods: Multiplex primers targeting the IGH framework 1 region and isotype region (Oncomine IGH-LR assay; detection of all nine isotypes) were used for IGH repertoire sequencing via the Ion Gene Studio S5 from 25ng peripheral blood total RNA derived from 63 individuals with CLL and 4 individuals with SMZL. Clonotyping and clonal lineage analysis was performed by Ion Reporter, whereby clonal lineages are defined as sets of unique rearrangements having a shared variable and joining gene, the same CDR3 length, and a minimum CDR3 nucleotide similarity of 85%. Ongoing CSR was defined as the presence of IgM/IgD and at least one switched isotype (IgG, IgA, or IgE), or a combination of switched isotypes, within the same lineage. Ongoing SHM was defined as the presence of subclones that differ within the VDJ region sequence compared to other clonal lineage members. Results: 11/68 cases showed evidence of ongoing CSR or SHM. Of the 57 cases showing no evidence of ongoing CSR or SHM, variable gene mutation analysis revealed the presence of three distinct subgroups having either no SHM, intermediate SHM (average 98% sequence identity) or high SHM < 94% identity). 3 of 4 SMZL cases showed evidence of ongoing CSR or SHM. Conclusions: These results reveal previously underappreciated heterogeneity within CLL and suggest the subdivision of CLL based on a combination of IGHV mutation level and presence of ongoing SHM or CSR. The described heterogeneity may serve as a valuable criterion for stratifying CLL patients in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207