MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vaccine safety management: foreign experience

2018· article· en· W3031257949 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haodong Cai, Yuqin Wang, Yuzhen Li

Bibliographic record

Venue药物不良反应杂志 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGovernment (linguistics)ImmunizationAgency (philosophy)VaccinationPublic healthBusinessEnvironmental healthVirologyImmunologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vaccination is one of the most successful public health achievements of human history. However, like any drug, no vaccine is absolutely safe. As the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases has been effectively controlled by vaccines, the safety of vaccines inoculated in healthy people has attracted more and more attention. The United States is the earliest country to start vaccine safety management. After some major vaccine safety incidents, vaccine safety management has gradually developed and improved. Vaccine safety regulator in the United States mainly consists of 4 federal agencies: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA). FDA is mainly responsible for pre-market registration and approval of vaccines, and supervision and inspection of vaccine manufacturers. CDC is mainly responsible for making immunization planning, monitoring of vaccine adverse reactions, and management of free vaccine projects of government. NIH is mainly responsible for vaccine research and development. HRSA is mainly responsible for vaccine accident compensation. In addition, the experience of European Medicines Agency in limitation of validity period of vaccine license and vaccine quality management and the experiences in safety management of vaccines in Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand, including cold chain management, surveillance of vaccine adverse events, etc. are worthy of learning. Key words: Vaccines; Safety; Public health administration; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; United States

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue药物不良反应杂志Same topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207