MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3031292493 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.1920

Baseline Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Cancer Patients Scheduled to Receive Cardiotoxic Cancer Therapies: A Position Statement and New Risk Assessment Tools from the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology in Collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society

2020· article· en· W3031292493 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander R. Lyon, Susan Dent, Susannah Stanway, Helena Earl, Christine Brezden‐Masley, Alain Cohen‐Solal, Carlo G. Tocchetti, Javid J. Moslehi, John D. Groarke, Jutta Bergler‐Klein, Vincent Khoo, Li Ling Tan, Markus S. Anker, Stephan von Haehling, Christoph Maack, Radek Pudil, Ana Barac, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Bonnie Ky, Tomas G. Neilan, Yu. N. Belenkov, Stuart D. Rosen, Zaza Iakobishvili, Aaron L. Sverdlov, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Ariane Vieira Scarlatelli Macedo, Charlotte Manisty, Fortunato Ciardiello, Dimitrios Farmakis, Rudolf A. de Boer, Hadi Skouri, Thomas Suter, Daniela Cardinale, Ronald Witteles, Michael G. Fradley, Joerg Herrmann, Robert F. Cornell, Ashutosh Wechelaker, Michael J. Mauro, Dragana Milojković, Hugues de Lavallade, Frank Ruschitzka, Andrew J.S. Coats, Petar Seferović, Ovidiu Chioncel, Thomas Thum, Johann Bauersachs, María Sol Andrés, David J. Wright, Teresa López‐Fernández, Chris Plummer, Daniel J. Lenihan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkSinai Health SystemMount Sinai Hospital
FundersCilagNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstitutePharmacyclicsIpsenNational Cancer InstituteServierAstellas PharmaEisaiDaiichi-SankyoDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchSanofiAbiomedPfizerIncyteIntas PharmaceuticalsCTI BiopharmaFondation LeducqNovo NordiskMyoKardiaAccurayAmicus TherapeuticsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsBoston Scientific CorporationAstraZenecaBarts CharityKaryopharm TherapeuticsAlereAudentes TherapeuticsAmgenNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCelgeneEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCancerCardiotoxicityOncologyTrastuzumabRisk assessmentHeart failureIntensive care medicineBreast cancerChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations770
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure→Same topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation→French-language works237,207→