MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Obstetrical and perinatal complications in survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: A population-based study.

2020· article· en· W3031352686 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alina Zgardau, Paul C. Nathan, Sumit Gupta, Joel G. Ray, Nancy N. Baxter, Chenthila Nagamuthu, Cindy Lau, Alison Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyHazard ratioCancerCancer registryObstetricsGestationPopulationConfidence intervalPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10529 Background: Women who survive cancer diagnosed in childhood, adolescence or young adulthood may develop long-term health issues. Data are lacking on adverse reproductive outcomes such as infertility and obstetrical and perinatal complications. Methods: Using linked Ontario provincial cancer and obstetrical registries, we assembled a cohort of female cancer survivors diagnosed before age 21 years from 1985-2012. We matched survivors by age and geographic region to females without a prior cancer diagnosis. Outcomes included i) any recognized and past 20 weeks’ gestation pregnancy; ii) perinatal complications; and iii) obstetrical complications (including a broad composite of severe maternal morbidity [SMM]). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and modified Poisson models compared survivors to a non-cancer group and assessed demographic, diagnostic and treatment risk factors in survivors. Results: 3,486 survivors were matched to 17,428 women without prior cancer. Median age at cancer diagnosis was 12 years (IQR 5-16) and median follow-up was 26 years (IQR 21-32). 599 (17.2%) survivors had at least one recognized pregnancy compared to 3,885 (22.3%) women without prior cancer (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.7-0.9, p < .0001). Among those who had a recognized pregnancy, 581 (97.0%) survivors carried a pregnancy > 20 weeks’ gestation vs. 3791 (97.6%) in the non-cancer group (Relative Risk [RR] 1.0, CI 0.98-1.04). Factors significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving at least one recognized pregnancy among survivors included brain tumour, cranial radiation, exposure to an alkylating agent or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Among women who had a livebirth or stillbirth, survivors had a RR of 2.3 (CI 1.5-3.6) for SMM and 3.2 (CI 1.6-6.6) for cardiac morbidity. Factors associated with SMM among survivors included brain tumour and pre-existing kidney disease. Among livebirth pregnancies, cancer survivors were at higher risk of preterm birth (RR 1.6, CI 1.2-2.0), especially those who received an alkylating agent or HSCT. Conclusions: Survivors of childhood, adolescence or young adulthood cancer are less likely to achieve a recognized pregnancy compared to women without prior cancer. Those who carry a pregnancy >20 weeks’ gestation are at higher risk for SMM and preterm birth. Fertility planning and counseling can be informed by cancer diagnosis and treatment, and high-risk obstetrical care is recommended for survivors at elevated risk of an adverse pregnancy outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207