MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Locking compression plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

2018· article· en· W3031401182 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jinhui Ma, Weiguo Wang, Bailiang Wang, Debo Yue, Wanshou Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua chuangshang zazhi · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeriprostheticNonunionIntramedullary rodSurgeryCochrane LibraryMeta-analysisFemurArthroplastyRandomized controlled trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of locking compression plate (LCP) and retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN) in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), providing reference for surgeons to select the fixation approach. Methods Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Wanfang database, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched to identify the retrospective comparison studies (RCS) which compared the clinical outcomes of LCP and RIMN for patients with periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the distal femur after TKA. The quality of included literatures was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa scale(NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software to compare the operation time, Knee society score (KSS), fracture healing time, nonunion rate, reoperation rate, and incidence of complications between the two groups. Results Ten retrospective comparison studies involving 487 patients were identified including LCP group (296 cases) and RIMN group (191 cases). The meta analysis results showed that no significant differences were found in the operation time (MD=10.89, 95%CI -9.56-31.33, P>0.05), KSS (MD=1.11, 95%CI -8.88-11.10, P=0.83), fracture healing time (MD=0.00, 95%CI-1.51-1.51, P>0.05), nonunion rate (OR=0.71, 95%CI 0.38-1.31, P>0.05), reoperation rate (OR=0.65, 95%CI 0.22-1.91, P>0.05), and complication incidence rate (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.38-1.26, P>0.05) between these two groups. Conclusions There are no significant differences in the operation time, KSS, fracture healing time, nonunion rate, reoperation rate, and complications between LCP and RIMN groups. LCP and RIMN have similar clinical outcomes in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fracture following TKA. Key words: Femur; Periprosthetic fractures; Fracture fixation, internal; Meta-analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.052
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua chuangshang zazhiSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207