MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031421037 · doi:10.26504/qec2020may_sa_lyons

COVID-19 and emergency department attendances in Irish public hospitals

2020· report· en· W3031421037 on OpenAlexaff
Aoife Brick, Brendan Walsh, Conor Keegan, Seán Lyons

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersEconomic and Social Research Institute
KeywordsTriageEmergency departmentIrishCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Medical emergencyMedicinePublic healthPandemicEmergency medicineHealth careNursingEconomic growthEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 29 February 2020 the first confirmed case of COVID-19 was announced in the Republic of Ireland.In subsequent weeks, progressively more restrictive control measures were introduced in an attempt to 'flatten the curve' and specifically to relieve pressure on emergency and critical care services.Using the most up to date data available on emergency department (ED) attendances in acute public hospitals, this analysis examines the impact on the numbers and types of attendances since the onset of COVID-19.Our analysis shows that there were on average 45.4 per cent fewer ED attendances per day in the week ending 29 March compared to the week ending 1 March.In addition, the reduction in ED attendances appears to be more prevalent in younger age groups.We also show that the proportion of ED attendances across triage categories, used to assess urgency of treatment, remained stable with no substantive changes in the overall proportion of very urgent/immediate attendances.Public information campaigns must encourage people to contact GPs and attend EDs if they require emergency care, and healthcare facilities must ensure that it is safe to do so. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207