MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The clinical value of endovascular stent in treatment of hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome: a Meta analysis

2016· article· en· W3031446432 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qiang Ma, Chaowen Yu, Pei Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Anat Clin · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneousStenosisBudd–Chiari syndromeStentRadiologySurgeryAngioplastyVeinInferior vena cava

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To analyze the clinical significance of endovascular stents in treatment of hepatic vein type Budd-Chiari syndrome. Methods Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessment method was used by carrying out the computer-based retrieval and collecting the documents about the endovascular stents in treatment of hepatic vein type Budd-Chiari syndrome at home and abroad, the searching time limit was set from January 1992 to July 2014, all of collected data were analyzed and summarized, and the Meta analysis was conducted for the diameter stenosis and blocking rate of postoperative endovascular stents and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Results After systematic retrieval based on search strategies, according to inclusion criteria, there were 6 Chinese papers and one English paper included, with a total of 534 patients. The Meta analysis was conducted for the diameter stenosis and blocking rate of postoperative endovascular stents and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in those included papers. The results showed that, after combining the diameter stenosis and blocking rate of postoperative percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and endovascular stents, the tests for heterogeneity revealed that it had the significant heterogeneity (χ2=15.821, P 0.05), which indicated that the diameter stenosis and blocking rate of postoperative endovascular stents and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in short-and medium-term had no significant differences. Conclusions Endovascular stents have advantages of a high success rate, higher safety and minimal invasion with definite efficacy in treatment of hepatic vein type Budd-Chiari syndrome. The diameter stenosis and blocking rate of postoperative endovascular stents and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in short-and medium-term had no significant differences. For patients with unclear therapeutic effects in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or with repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, they may consider the endovascular stent therapy. Key words: Budd-Chiari syndrome; Hepatic vein occlusion; Interventional treatment; Endovascular stent

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J Anat ClinSame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207